Aggressive Human Drivers Will Be Able to Bully Autonomous Cars

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Mercedes-Benz CEO Dietmar Exler thinks that the biggest problem autonomous vehicles will have to face is human drivers being dicks to them. We anticipate other unforeseen problems, but Exler’s prediction of automotive bullying seems like a safe bet.

There’s a number of ways to kick sand in a self-driving car’s face.

As Mercedes-Benz continues developing autonomous technology for its own fleet, Exler expressed to the Los Angeles Times that the company had some initial concerns about customer acceptance. Market research cleared that up fairly quickly. Exler is now convinced that anyone who experiences a vehicle that can drive itself in bumper-to-bumper traffic will suddenly become a convert. He also isn’t worried about insurance or liability issues, as he feels the technology is progressing rapidly.

What he is concerned about are of all the humans that might take advantage of a self-driving car.

Since autonomous cars are likely to be programmed to be courteous and regulated to be cautious, they should be extremely defensive drivers. This is something that is infrequently the case with flesh and blood operators, and Exler thinks that the more aggressive drivers will probably bully self-driving vehicles.

From the Times:

When someone tries to cut in line at a traffic merge, humans won’t let them in. But a driverless car will be programmed to stop when it sees an obstruction — like a line cutter. “They’ll look for the autonomous car and that’s where they’ll cut in,” (Exler) said.

That sort of thinking makes you wonder how many times an autonomous vehicle might be cheated out of its turn at a four-way stop, or how it might handle finding a parking spot in New York City traffic. While computer-controlled cars could certainly be programmed to be more aggressive, Exler doubts regulators would allow that. They will likely be intentionally passive by design and mandated to follow speed limits and traffic laws.

Exler says that even if driverless cars were mainstreamed today, they’d still be sharing the road with regular vehicles for decades. So, until they take away the right to drive, humans and computers will have to coexist on the road. That means people with autonomous vehicles will have to relax and take the occasional beating in traffic or disengage their autopilot and mix it up with the rest of us.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • Sector 5 Sector 5 on Nov 20, 2016

    Seems even computers can't undo the "pleasures," of high density living. Those humans that cause accidents with autonomous vehicles should get dumped in the insurance faculty by their insurer and pay $$$thousands in premiuns.

  • Mechimike Mechimike on Nov 21, 2016

    "until they take away the right to drive..." Did this send a chill up anyone else's spine, or was that just me? Also: I don't see "right to drive" in the Constitution anywhere. But still.

  • ToolGuy Let's count the poor decisions: Honda 18 model years past peak Honda. Ohio. Following too closely ('rock on the highway' doesn't leap up and attack your vehicle by itself, it is riding on a vehicle or thrown up by a vehicle, and you should be alert to this). Ohio. Not enough doors. Choosing to expand family -- in Ohio. 😉 Also not great at math.Engine bay picture: At least take a shower before your glamour shot lol.
  • ToolGuy Took me a minute to post; had to go back and see which account I was using the last time I commented on this topic (consistency is important). Thank you for your patience.
  • ToolGuy Ok wow, just wow. I used to live in America. Land of the free -- have I heard that somewhere? And here come TTAC writers and commentariat goose stepping in lockstep, dancing on the grave of liberty. Didn't your dysfunctional homeowners association get all that government overreach out of your system? I thought we won WW2, guess I was mistaken.
  • Dartman If one is so hellbent on drawing attention to themselves just mount a big “Trump 2024” or “Black Lives Matter” flag (your choice) on your truck and call it day. Lot cheaper, same result.
  • AZFelix I'd buy a 'harlequin' edition if it was composed of a company's complete palette of greys and silver.Family had a couple of Pontiacs in teal and purple in years past. I was not a fan.My current ride is Lakeside Blue.
Next