Guest Review: 2016 Mazda MX-5 Grand Touring Automatic

Ur-Turn
by Ur-Turn

Please welcome TTAC reader Mike Allen. He recently took delivery of an automatic-transmission MX-5 and drove it through California in search of enlightenment!

The fourth-generation Miata is no stranger to these pages, having been reviewed by Tim Cain and Alex Dykes in the past year. But these reviews, like most of those you’ll find out there on the Internet, are based on short drives of manual-transmission models.

For many auto enthusiasts, the idea of buying a Miata with an automatic transmission verges on a Pelagian level of heresy. Yet for those of us who are condemned to the purgatory of Los Angeles traffic, even the most damnable heresy eventually becomes palatable. That’s why my loaded-up, Grand-Touring-spec MX-5 has just two pedals.

As you’ll see below, that doesn’t mean it’s not worthy of your consideration. Shortly after taking delivery last month, I took it on a 900-mile trip to the heart of inland California and found that out for myself.

Many TTAC readers are “numbers guys.” So am I. Let’s start with a few numbers.

A loaded Grand Touring Miata costs $32,105. A lot of people out there think the Miata Club is the one to get, particularly the Club with Brembo brakes. But I’ll tell you the Grand Touring is the best Miata. It has all the modern convenience features and it still weighs under 2,400 pounds on Car and Driver’s scale. That same publication achieved a 15.1 second quarter mile out of the Grand Touring automatic. That’s not going to make any Corvettes nervous. It might not even win a stoplight drag race with a Toyota Avalon V6. But if you’re a drag racer, there are better ways to spend your thirty-two grand.

That’s not to say that the automatic saps the Miata’s energy. This is one of those rare cars where you can use full throttle pretty much everywhere. It will chirp the tires off the line and hold the gear all the way to 6,500 rpm for each shift. If you hold the revs at 3,000 or so before letting the brakes off, you’ll even bounce your passenger’s head a bit at takeoff. This is a traditional torque-converter automatic. There’s nothing weird or high-tech about it. I’m expecting it to last a long time and it’s less fragile than the new manual transmission that arrived with the ND Miata from what I’ve read on the forums.

There are three ways to operate your self-shifting MX-5. The first is to leave it in “D” and let the car make its own decisions about how to shift. This is what you want most of the time. The automatic Miata’s “D” mode is a lot like the “sport” modes you’ll find in other cars. It’s not in a big hurry to upshift and it doesn’t throw the car into high gear when you’re coasting to a stop. Driven with light throttle in traffic, you can expect most shifts to happen before 3,500 rpm.

Flicking the single-purpose switch on the console below the shifter will put you into Sport mode. Now you’re really getting somewhere. In Sport, the Miata will hold gears with religious fervor, often letting you zip down the road at a steady 5,500 rpm or a bit higher without an upshift. The grade logic that’s built into the transmission becomes hyperactive. During my long drive, which took me a few hundred miles away from the coast and into the heart of California oil country, I drove up and down a few 4,500-foot mountains. Sport mode is perfect for this. It keeps the revs very high both up and down the hill. Your fuel economy will suffer, of course — I’m used to 30-31 miles per gallon on the 101 Freeway, but 23 mpg is more likely when you’re hauling ass in Sport mode.

I’ve never driven a car that took “sport mode” as seriously as the ND Miata. But the minute you engage cruise control, Sport mode deactivates and the car shifts up to top gear. Cruise control and sport mode are mutually exclusive. Get used to it.

Last but not least, there’s an “M” mode that allows you to use the Tiptronic-style push-pull gate or the steering-wheel-mounted paddles. This gives you the satisfaction of calling your own shots, so to speak, but I gave up on using them after just a few hundred backroad miles in the Miata. Remember this is a conventional torque-converter transmission, so you’re not gonna get an instant DSG-style shift out of the system. Nor do the shifts happen exactly when you ask for them. The good news is that gear changes appear to bang home with a little more authority than they do in Drive or Sport.

As an automatic-transmission Grand Touring, the Miata has a unique and charming character. Everything you touch is high quality. The stereo is good and Bluetooth integration is solid. The primary annoyance is that the touchscreen deactivates when you’re on the move, forcing you to use the little clicky knob on the console if you want to change the radio station or switch audio sources.

The rest of the package is standard Miata: fade-free brakes, razor-sharp handling with very little sense of inertia, adequate interior room for drivers up to six-foot-three, very small trunk, limited cabin storage space, one-hand-operation fabric top, ice-cold air conditioning.

Once upon a time, getting an automatic transmission in a Japanese car meant that you were a masochist or an idiot. Remember the two-speed Hondamatic in the original Accords? The first-generation Miata lost a lot of charm when you bought the automatic, largely because the engine simply didn’t have enough twist to keep a slushbox moving with authority. But this 2016 Miata can be enjoyed without recourse to either masochism or embarrassed justification. In a perfect world, we’d all drive stick-shift Miatas … but if you’re forced by traffic or other considerations to make a decision between a self-shifting Miata and a traditional sedan or CUV, trust me, this is the automatic choice.

[Image: © 2016 Mike Allen]

Ur-Turn
Ur-Turn

More by Ur-Turn

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 28 comments
  • White Shadow White Shadow on Aug 31, 2016

    There are some cars that I'd never even consider driving unless they were stick. This is one of those cars.

    • TonyJZX TonyJZX on Sep 01, 2016

      This would be a slam dunk if it was a 7 speed DSG flappy paddle whatever. Conventional auto? Nah.

  • Thetopdog Thetopdog on Sep 12, 2016

    Since when is traffic a reason to not drive a manual? It's not like the clutch on a manual Miata requires any great deal of effort. I've lived in Southern California for the past 5 years and I drove an NB Miata with a 6-speed stick as my daily for 3 of those years and it was perfectly fine. My current car (2008 Viper) has a much heavier clutch but even that is tolerable, and I've had 2 knee surgeries on my left leg. The idea that an enthusiast would be unable to tolerate a Miata's clutch pedal in traffic is ridiculous in my opinion

  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
Next