Volkswagen Wants to Mend Fences With America, Promises Big U.S. Production Push

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Disgraced automaker Volkswagen AG is trying to smooth things over in the United States by promising to increase its commitment to North America. The company has stated that its core brand’s lineup will swell to include new electric vehicles slated for U.S. production in 2021.

The task of building those vehicles comes with a mountain of challenges.

“We will be significantly stepping up our activities in the USA,” Volkswagen brand chief Herbert Diess said on Tuesday. “Our goals are high and our strategy is very ambitious.”

Saying VW’s strategy is “very ambitious” is like saying the sun is “very hot.” The company just reached an agreement with its workers to cut 30,000 jobs worldwide to free up 3.7 billion euros in cash. The company also expects to reduce expenses by an additional 2.5 billion euros by eliminating conventional models that will eventually be replaced by EVs.

Saddled with a minimum of $16.5 billion in fines and repairs in the U.S. resulting from the emissions scandal, a devalued stock price, a reduction in sales, suppliers angry that VW has demanded they cut prices by $3 billion, and a net loss of $4.6 billion in 2015, the company has an uphill battle.

Bloomberg reports that Volkswagen’s namesake brand accounts for nearly half of the group’s sales. However, it was experiencing bloated production costs and management issues well before the diesel emissions crisis. Productivity at VW was 30 percent lower than its peers and the company was spending 60 percent more per vehicle than Toyota had over the same period.

The company’s new plan includes launching higher-margin SUVs, sedans, and electric cars in the hopes to win back customers in markets where it severely lagged competitors. Diess said that success will be imperative to reviving the core brand, as it accounted for 59 percent of the German group’s auto sales in 2015 (but only a scant 16 percent of the group’s operating profit).

“We not only want to be profitable in Europe and China but are determined to generate positive results in all major markets by 2020,” he told reporters.

“For years we have been lacking a blueprint for success in the U.S., while we are losing ground to rivals in markets like Brazil or India. In part we have also missed market trends, above all the SUV boom,” said Diess

Volkswagen now says it plans to increase its SUV and crossover lineup to nineteen vehicles by 2020. The company currently has two: the Tiguan and Touareg, with the upcoming Atlas arriving next year.

As of now, VW’s sole factory in the United States resides in in Chattanooga, Tennessee. If Volkswagen plans to produce a bevy of new electric cars in North America, that factory — which builds the Passat and, beginning next year, the Atlas — is the obvious candidate. Does Volkswagen have the capital required to pay its dues and create the production capacity needed to build the promised three million units?

“Over the next few years, Volkswagen will change radically. Very few things will stay as they are,” Diess said. “The electric car will become the strategic core of the VW brand.”

It will have to change drastically if it wants to pull any of this off.

[Image: Volkswagen]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 34 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Nov 24, 2016

    If we're really going to see widespread EV adoption, other manufacturers need to get their heads out of their posteriors and buy into Tesla's Supercharger network. The spread of DC fast charging is great but a 24 kW DCFC charger (50 kW at best) does not hold a candle to a Tesla 125 kW Supercharger.

  • DearS DearS on Nov 25, 2016

    I hate how some like to change their image and not their culture, soul, or behavior. Although I like the engineers and workers, I don't like the execs or company.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next