Consumer Reports Rates 'Imperfect' Car With Perfect Score
Consumer Reports says that Tesla’s Model S P85D initially scored 103 points out of a possible 100, which initially “broke” their rating system.
Consumer Reports adjusted the overall score to 100, and said that the Model S P85D wasn’t perfect, but that it was very good:
To be clear, the Tesla’s 100 score doesn’t make the P85D a perfect car—even at $127,820. It has imperfections. The interior materials aren’t as opulent as other high-ticket automobiles, and its ride is firmer and louder than our base Model S.
What’s more, a lengthy road trip in an electric car with a 200-plus mile range can be a logistical hurdle if a quick-charging station isn’t along your route.
It’s also important to note that our Rating doesn’t include the Tesla’s reliability. The Model S has average reliability, according to our owner-survey responses.
The Model S P85D sports upgrades beyond the Model S, including “insane” and “ludicrous” speed modes that can propel the car from 0-60 in fewer than 3 seconds.
Previously, the Model S was the highest-rated car Consumer Reports had ever tested. The 1996 Porsche Boxster also scored a “perfect” 100 almost 20 years ago.
Consumer Reports said that the 103 score and its subsequent re-scoring of 100 wouldn’t impact other cars’ ratings.
“This car is not perfect in every single way,” said Jake Fisher, Auto Test Director for Consumer Reports. “It doesn’t fit in the rest of the automotive marketplace.”
Fisher added that the scoring system was “non-linear,” meaning cars wouldn’t need to accelerate from 0-60 mph in around 3 seconds to score well on the test.
According to the testers, the Model S P85D’s interior shortcomings and initial buyer satisfaction were more-than compensated by the car’s performance and fuel economy, which are both greater than the Model S.
More by Aaron Cole
Comments
Join the conversation
I don't even know how Consumer Reports continues to have a sustained readership--one that pays for their shoddy advice at that when it's so easy to research independently. They're biased, and I've used products that happened to receive good scores from CR, yet in real life it was terrible (and vice versa). Anecdotal, but only to an extent. What's more, CR is limited in what it reviews--so many superior products are left untested. An example: Speed Queen washers and dryers and Sanitaire commercial-grade vacuum cleaners are far superior products than anything that can be had at Lowes, Walmart, Sears, Target, etc., bar none. Instead, most people miss out because the best they can do is offer a high score toward undeserving products like the glitzy laundry toys from Korea and space-age vacuums that have to be replaced as often as a razor (and so on). Candid reviews from owners who use the product on a daily basis trumps CR, along with research and personal criteria that need to be met. Relying on CR only means that the consumer cannot think for him/herself and needs to be (blindingly) led to buy what CR wants the reader to buy.
This is the same 100% perfect car that locked the testers out due to a faulty door actuator system? The only thing broken is CR goofy rating system and there Musk wearing iPhone addicted kids writing these reviews!