Wary or Enthusiastic? MIT Wants Your Views on Automated Driving Technologies

Kamil Kaluski
by Kamil Kaluski

Like it or not, autonomous vehicles are coming in one form or another.

Many new cars on the market already have features that help a driver stay in the driving lane, keep a safe distance from the vehicle in front, or reduce the severity of a collision. Much like the original stability control, these features may frustrate enthusiasts but they help keep the masses safer and might reduce accidents.

Each year, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the New England Motor Press Association hold a conference that focuses on various future trends and technologies. This year’s topic is The Intersection of Technology and Design, with a panel discussion exploring trends and challenges as autonomous technology meets the natural aesthetic appeal of the automobile.

To get a better understanding of how American motorists feel about autonomous driving, the MIT AgeLab is presenting a survey that asks pointed questions about their experience, interest, and knowledge of autonomous technologies. It is a very short survey, the results of which will be presented at the conference.

The survey was created by Bryan Reimer, Ph.D., a research scientist in the MIT AgeLab and Associate Director of the New England University Transportation Center at MIT. It not only asks about your comfort level with the technology but also about your trust in technology companies that thus far have had very little experience in the world of automobiles.

“The myth about automation is that as the level of human responsibility decreases so do the need for education,” says Reimer. “Given that we are rapidly increasing the level of automated vehicle technology it is an open question as to where people are going to learn how to appropriately use it.”

That is a legitimate concern. The survey is open from April 26 to May 15. The results will be presented on May 26 at the NEMPA/MIT Technology Conference, which I will attend.

[Images: Volvo Car Corporation, Ford Motor Company]

Kamil Kaluski
Kamil Kaluski

More by Kamil Kaluski

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 63 comments
  • Steve Biro Steve Biro on Apr 28, 2016

    The sad things is, given the leading nature of many of the questions, I can see them disregarding my responses as beng from an outlier. They'll take a look at my age and just decide I'm a cranky, old luddite who fears all technology and hates anything new. And they'd be completely wrong.

    • WheelMcCoy WheelMcCoy on Apr 28, 2016

      My guess is most TTAC readers share your opinion, but I don't know if enough will respond to make our position a significant data point. @Kamil, I look forward to your follow up article after the conference! I'm sure MIT will have a Q&A session. Please troll them hard... well, while remaining as professional as you can. :)

  • Don1967 Don1967 on Apr 28, 2016

    I tend to begrudgingly accept most new nanny technologies after experiencing them. In particular stability/yaw control, adaptive cruise control and city collision avoidance work too damn well to deny. Two exceptions include lane departure warnings, and traction control that cannot be quickly disengaged when you're immobilized in deep snow. More of a nuisance than anything.

  • Bkojote Smart move if the financials work, considering the R3 has way more excitement around it than just about any Tesla product, as Tesla only seems to only excite tech illiterate guys who lost their wives mortgaging their house to buy bored apes.If Apple does in fact tie up with Rivian Tesla's goose is ultra-cooked.
  • Jkross22 Tim Apple sniffing around to see if he can sucker someone else into under-RAM'ing devices to save $2/unit and force upgrade people.
  • Jkross22 Not to rub salt in the wound, but why would you put your hq in some extraordinarily expensive real estate like Manhattan Beach? I know little of Fisker the person, but this reeks of ego and the desire for appearances.
  • 3-On-The-Tree I’ve responded to several bike accidents where if the guy wasn’t wearing a helmet he would’ve been in a casket. Plus it saves your hearing.
  • Wjtinfwb Nice cars and a find if you're into Radwood type iron. But a near 40 year old anything, even something as robust as a Legend is going to have failure points that would be prohibitively expensive to fix. Electronics, A/C, leaky old gaskets, creaking suspension bushing etc., not to mention the lack of safety gear and an interior that no doubt has "seen a lot". I applaud the manual transmission, but you could likely find something 30 years newer for not much more money to hone your heel and toe skills on before graduating to a more expensive ride.
Next