Pesky Small Overlap Crash Test Sinks Another One

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s small overlap crash test — the bane of every automaker’s existence — has prevented another pickup from achieving high marks.

This time, it’s the 2017 Nissan Titan — a full-size pickup struggling to stand apart from its domestic competition after recently undergoing its first redesign in 13 years.

In IIHS testing, the Titan crew cab, like many of its rivals, folded under pressure during the small overlap test. That keeps the truck out of the running for an ad-worthy Top Safety Pick rating.

The small overlap test, introduced in 2012, has sunk many a vehicle’s crash rating. Designed to simulate a partial frontal collision with another vehicle — or an impact with a tree or utility pole — the test has proved notoriously hard to master. Nissan’s Titan garnered a second-from-bottom “marginal” rating.

During the 40 mph test, intrusion into the footwell reached 11 inches at the lower door hinge pillar and 8.3 inches at the dead pedal, almost guaranteeing lower leg injuries for the driver. As with many other models, the Titan performed just fine in the other tests. Moderate overlap, side and rollover protection was rated “good,” as was the model’s head restraints.

Headlight performance — the latest addition to IIHS’s testing regimen, and another industry sore point — turned up marginal. A frontal crash prevention system is absent from the model’s equipment roster.

While this is bad news for the Titan, its competition didn’t exactly excel. Only one pickup — the recently redesigned Honda Ridgeline — earned a Top Safety Pick + rating. Two variants of Ford’s F-150 were the only other pickups to earn a good rating in all crash tests. The Titan can at least comfort itself in knowing that it isn’t the Ram 1500, which scored marginal ratings in both the small overlap and roof strength tests.

The Toyota Tundra, Chevrolet Silverado 1500 and GMC Sierra 1500 crew cabs also saw a marginal rating for the small overlap test. Extended cab variants of these three models garnered an acceptable rating.

[Image capture: YouTube]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 65 comments
  • Dantes_inferno Dantes_inferno on Jan 26, 2017

    They should remove the Titan nameplate from the truck and affix it to the crash testing wall.

  • Brettc Brettc on Jan 26, 2017

    I like how they put a giant smart phone in the centre console for added realism! Apparently Nissan forgot about crash tests or they are fresh out of you know what.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next