Renault-Nissan Takeover Gives Mitsubishi a Chance to Dump Its Most Embarrassing Product

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After inking the deal that brought Mitsubishi Motors under his corporate umbrella, Nissan-Renault chairman Carlos Ghosn said the acquisition would have a “massive” impact on the struggling automaker.

By sharing the alliance’s technology, platforms and engines, Mitsubishi can look forward to a brighter, product-filled future, he claimed. Full integration is still years away, but a new report sheds some light on the first all-new product born of the $2.29 billion deal.

According to Nikkei (via Reuters), the alliance takeover means a new green vehicle for Mitsubishi. The newspaper claims the all-electric model will borrow the platform and powertrain of the next-generation Nissan Leaf.

That’s good news for Mitsubishi, as the company’s current electric car is anything but hot. Small, odd-looking, and sporting an estimated 59 miles of range, the diminutive i-MiEV hatchback can’t compete with the robust, long-range rivals entering the EV market. The model returns for 2017, just so Mitsubishi can keep an EV in its lineup.

If you’re thinking of scoring a $23,845 i-MiEV, expect to find yourself in a club with few members. Sales of the awkward EV totaled 91 units in the U.S. during the first 11 months of 2016. Mitsubishi sold five of them in November, four in October.

When we’ll see this new model is up for debate. Last week, Renault-Nissan announced that the next-generation Leaf and Renault Zoe would share the same platform, but the company wasn’t in the mood to discuss specifics. The alliance’s senor vice president, Arnaud Deboeuf, said the shared-platform EVs would appear sometime after the Leaf’s 2018 refresh. French newspaper Les Echos said the vehicles wouldn’t appear before 2020.

That timeline doesn’t exactly jibe with earlier reports, which hinted at a new, long-range Leaf arriving in 2018. The Nikkei report mentions the same date for the launch of the new EVs. Hopefully, we’ll hear official word at next month’s Consumer Electronics Show or North American International Auto Show.

According to Nikkei, by sharing a platform, motor, inverter and battery, the new Leaf should see its price drop by one-fifth. With these components on hand, Mitsubishi could sell a new, much longer-ranged vehicle at a competitive price point, and send the unloved i-MiEv behind the barn.

Whether or not the future Mitsubishi adopts the four-door hatchback bodystyle of its corporate siblings is another mystery. Automotive News speculates that the i-MiEV’s replacement could take on a crossover bodystyle.

[Image: Mitsubishi Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • Make_light I like Subarus, and I often think they don't get enough credit for how they drive. Lots of people say it's the faux-rugged image that accounts for their popularity, but they also drive with a solidity and plantedness that's absent from a lot of the Japanese competition. That being said, this thing is ugly. I never felt that Subarus were as ugly as commenters claim they are. Boring, sure, but not necessarily ugly. But between this and the refreshed Legacy, it's like they're trying to make their vehicles look as incohesive and awkward as possible.
  • SCE to AUX I think the 2.2 was a pretty durable engine.
  • Rochester We'll probably be trading in our 2018 Touring Edition Forester for the next model, and are waiting to see what the Hybrid is all about. Would be nice if they disclose whether or not it will be a plug-in Hybrid.
  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
Next